Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Crit Care ; 37: 219-223, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27969574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With a growing obesity epidemic, the approach to care of this patient remains controversial and in many circumstances different than the general population. Appropriate hemodynamic support, although still controversial, remains a cornerstone of septic shock therapy. Catecholamines are currently recommended by guidelines without a preferred dosing strategy. However, the use of weight-based (µg kg-1 min-1) or nonweight-based (µg/min) vasopressor drip rates may impact patient care in these populations. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients receiving nonweight-based catecholamine infusions for septic shock were grouped into nonobese (n = 112) or obese (n = 196), and evaluated based on hemodynamic resuscitation. For the primary outcome, groups were analyzed for the requirement of a secondary hemodynamic support agent to obtain a goal mean arterial pressure of greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of time to a secondary hemodynamic support agent, time to hemodynamic stability (HDS), ability to obtain HDS at 24 hours, and death due to cardiovascular collapse. RESULTS: With the exception of weight and sex, baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Early resuscitative fluids were given at a lower weight based, but not total volume dose in the obese group (nonobese, 34.8 mL/kg vs obese, 22.4 mL/kg; P < .0001). The primary end point of addition of any secondary hemodynamic support agent was significantly greater in obese patients when adjusted for institution (nonobese, 19% vs obese, 27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.77). Time to HDS was also prolonged (nonobese, 3.5 hours vs obese, 5.3 hours; P = .006). CONCLUSION: This study calls into question the adequacy of a nonweight-based approach to hemodynamic support of critically ill obese patients. This strategy seems to result in less aggressive, lower weight-based vasopressor and fluid doses, and more diverse approach than their nonobese counterparts.


Assuntos
Catecolaminas/administração & dosagem , Hidratação/métodos , Hemodinâmica , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Ressuscitação , Choque Séptico/terapia , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Pressão Arterial , Peso Corporal , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Estado Terminal , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...